← Back to Volume 14

Under the Tightening Environment of Globalization in US and EU, Chinese Multinational Enterprise ’S International Human Reality Management’s Difference and Countermeasure——Take Oil Companies as Example

Yanwu Chen
pp.257-264 DOI: 10.62051/7ymg0a95 December 23, 2024
Download PDF
Abstract: Background: United States and European countries are tightening their open policies to China, under the background of increasing tariffs and trade barriers, there is an urgent need for China's overseas trading companies to implement the necessary countermeasures to deal with the pressure on their enterprises. Oil, as a major energy source and commodity, it is more susceptible to political factors such as geopolitics and battle of national power. Method: The author searched three main keywords including international human resource management, trade war, and oil companies on CNKI and Google Scholar, through literature analysis, from the perspective of oil companies, this paper puts forward a new enlightenment for international human resource management for Chinese overseas enterprises under the background of trade war. Conclusion: In the case that China's macro conditions are difficult to change, In order to cope with the impact on seven aspects that companies may encounter, enterprises should make adjustments in seven aspects, including strategy, employees, recruitment, selection, compensation, system construction.
Keywords: International human reality management; Trade war; Oil Company.
APA Citation: Yanwu Chen (2024). Under the Tightening Environment of Globalization in US and EU, Chinese Multinational Enterprise ’S International Human Reality Management’s Difference and Countermeasure——Take Oil Companies as Example. Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research, 14(1), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.62051/7ymg0a95

References

  1. T. Liu, W.T. Woo, Understanding the U.S.-China Trade War, China Economic Journal, 11, 3, (2018) 319–340.
  2. Z.B. Bian, The response of petroleum equipment trading enterprises in the context of the "Trade war", Market Forum, 4, (2019) 30-17.
  3. W.Y. Liu, Sinopec Enterprise Group's problems and countermeasures in human resource management in Saudi Arabia are discussed, Modern economic information, 06 (2015) 128-131.
  4. X. Lv, Differences in international human resource management and their strategies. Business2.0, 04 (2023) 26-28.
  5. X.H. Lan, Staying inside: The Chinese government and economic development, Contemporary Guangxi, 22 (2021) 62.
  6. S.J. Zhang, Y.X. Jiang, J.J. Tai, Sinopec human resources shared service model, Innovation World Weekly, 01 (2023) 18-27.
  7. K. Itakura, Evaluating the impact of the US–China trade war. Asian Economic Policy Review, 15, 1 (2020) 77-93.
  8. N.F.L. Cheng, A.S. Hasanov, W.C. Poon, E. Bouri, The US-China trade war and the volatility linkages between energy and agricultural commodities, Energy Economics, 120 (2023).
  9. Q.D. Hu, Study on United States countermeasures for financial warfare against China. Southeast University, (2022).
  10. T. Liu, et al. Expatriates’ boundary-spanning: double-edged effects in multinational enterprises, Journal of International Business Studies, (2024) 1-13.
  11. S.M. Zhang, A brief discussion on international human resource management from the perspective of cross-cultural management: Reflections on the practice of human resource management in PetroChina's overseas projects, Modern business, 14 (2015) 72-73.
  12. R.S. Schuler, S.E. Jackson, I. Tarique, Global talent management and global talent challenges: Strategic opportunities for IHRM, Journal of World Business, 46, 4 (2011) 506-516.